Green Claims, Red Flags: EnergyAustralia Settles Carbon Offsets Court Case
Turns out, going “carbon neutral” isn’t as easy as slapping a label on your energy bill.
In a significant development for corporate environmental accountability and the first of its kind in Australia, EnergyAustralia has just settled a Federal Court case after being accused of greenwashing.
So, what was the issue? EnergyAustralia’s “Go Neutral” product promised carbon neutrality by purchasing carbon offsets instead of actually reducing carbon emissions. But critics, and now the courts, say that doesn’t cut it!
As the energy sector continues to navigate the transition to net-zero obligations, this settlement underscores the importance of transparency.
In response to the settlement, the energy giant admitted that carbon offsets aren’t a magic fix. In fact, they made a rare public confession, by releasing a statement noting:
"Today, EnergyAustralia acknowledges that carbon offsetting is not the most effective way to assist customers to reduce their emissions."
"Offsets do not prevent or undo the harms caused by burning fossil fuels for a customer’s energy use."
"There are legitimate concerns about organisations: using offsets instead of reducing their own emissions.... using offset projects that do not permanently remove carbon from the atmosphere...."
EnergyAustralia say they are now focusing on direct emission reductions and helping customers use less energy in the first place - better late than never?
So, what does this mean for corporations and their risks?
Could this be an inflection point for corporate Australia choosing to use offsets instead of actual emission reduction strategies? Can they keep choosing offsets instead of reduction when Federal court cases, against the biggest organisations in Australia are playing out in this way?
For example, in Australia we use 33B litres of diesel every year and that number keeps growing. Mining, transport, logistics, construction, agriculture, and data centres are the biggest users of diesel. To date, this has all been fossil-fuel based diesel. Every year... emissions, emissions, emissions, and maybe some offsets. But there is an alternative... Renewable Diesel.
Unlike offsets, which rely on far-off projects and fuzzy math, renewable diesel is a low-barrier switch from fossil diesel that directly cuts carbon at the source and helps companies whose operations rely on fossil fuel diesel to hit their net-zero goals without the guesswork. We at RD2Go are making it easier than ever for fleets and businesses to take real climate action fast. For organisations serious about sustainability, this is the kind of “quick win” that actually delivers!
Moral of the story? If you’re going to sell climate-friendly promises, make sure they actually help the climate.
________________________________________________________
A bit confused about offsets? According to the Australian Government's Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water (DCCEEW) a carbon offset unit represents one tonne of carbon dioxide equivalent (tCO₂-e) that has been avoided or removed from the atmosphere. In Australia, these units are purchased by businesses and individuals to compensate for their own emissions. However, the problem is that offsets don’t reduce emissions at the source and often rely on projects that are hard to verify or take years to deliver real impact. This makes them asignificantly weaker tool for immediate, meaningful climate action