HVO and Carbon: How Renewable Diesel Reduces Emissions Across Every Scope

A practical guide to what changes - and what doesn't - when you switch from fossil diesel to HVO.

Switching to HVO renewable diesel cuts emissions, but the question fleet managers, sustainability managers, and NGER auditors most often ask is: which emissions, measured how, and under which framework? The answer depends on where in the fuel's lifecycle you look. Here is a clear breakdown across every relevant scope.

Data note: Combustion emission factors cited in this article are drawn from the National Greenhouse Accounts (NGA) Factors 2025, published by the Australian Government. Additional lifecycle and pollutant reduction figures are sourced from peer-reviewed industry research and OEM technical documentation.

The Three Lenses: Scope 1, Scope 3, and Lifecycle

Greenhouse gas emissions from fuel are typically measured at three points. Each tells a different part of the story and each matters for a different reporting or decision-making context.

Scope 1

Direct / Tailpipe Emissions

What comes out of the exhaust when the fuel is burned. This is what you report under NGER as direct emissions.

Scope 3

Indirect / Production Emissions

Emissions from producing, refining, and transporting the fuel before it reaches your tank - the upstream footprint.

Full Lifecycle (Well-to-Wheel): Up to 90% Reduction

The headline figure for HVO is its full lifecycle greenhouse gas reduction of up to 90% compared to conventional fossil diesel. This is the measure most commonly cited by OEMs, sustainability teams, and government policy documents - and it is the most meaningful single number for organisations setting net-zero targets or reporting against science-based pathways.

This reduction is primarily driven by the feedstock. Fossil diesel draws carbon from ancient reserves, adding net-new CO₂ to the atmosphere. HVO is made from waste materials, used cooking oils, animal fats, agricultural residues, whose carbon was recently part of the natural cycle. Processing and transport emissions are also significantly lower than the equivalent upstream chain for crude oil refining.

Fossil Diesel - lifecycle GHG Baseline (100%)
HVO Renewable Diesel - lifecycle GHG Up to ~8-10% of fossil baseline [1]

Scope 1 Direct Combustion Emissions: Zero CO₂ Under the NGA

When HVO burns, it does produce CO₂ just like fossil diesel. So how can its Scope 1 CO₂ factor be zero?

The answer lies in where that carbon came from. Fossil diesel releases carbon that has been locked underground for millions of years - it is a net addition to the atmosphere. HVO's carbon was absorbed from the atmosphere by living organisms in the recent past. When it is released on combustion, it simply returns carbon that was recently part of the natural cycle. This is what the NGA calls biogenic carbon, and under the NGA 2025, the Scope 1 CO₂ combustion factor for HVO (paraffinic diesel) is zero.

For organisations reporting under the National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting (NGER) scheme, this is significant: switching to HVO eliminates your direct combustion CO₂ from day one - without carbon offsets, fleet replacement, or infrastructure changes.

What about CH4 and N2O?

HVO does carry trace combustion emissions of methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) - approximately 0.01 kg CO2-e per litre in total. These are the same minor non-CO2 combustion emissions present in biodiesel, and they are reported under the NGA. The CO2 component, however, remains zero.

Scope 1 Beyond CO₂: NOx and Particulate Matter

Scope 1 emissions are not limited to greenhouse gases. HVO also delivers meaningful reductions in two other exhaust pollutants that carry significant health and regulatory implications:

Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) - fossil diesel Baseline
Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) - HVO Typically 7-30% reduction depending on engine type [2,4,5]
Particulate Matter (PM) - fossil diesel Baseline
Particulate Matter (PM) - HVO Typically 30-85% reduction depending on engine type [2,3,6]

Reductions in particulate matter (PM) are consistently observed across engine types, primarily due to HVO's zero aromatic content and high cetane number. Studies report reductions ranging from 30-65% in typical fleet conditions, with manufacturer testing of Renewable Diesel and HVO reporting up to 85% in controlled conditions [2]. Cummins' own testing of the QSK95 generator set recorded 30-60% PM reduction [3]. These reductions are particularly significant for enclosed and underground environments (mining operations, tunnels, and data centre generators) where diesel particulate exposure carries serious health risks under tightening workplace exposure limits.

NOx reductions are more variable and depend heavily on engine technology, injection calibration, and load conditions. The ISO20400 report cites reductions of 19-30% for standard HVO [2]; a peer-reviewed urban fleet study found a 7% local reduction potential for modern Euro 4-6 passenger vehicles [4]; and engine optimisation studies show up to 18% NOx reduction when injection systems are recalibrated for HVO [5]. Operators with older non-aftertreatment engines will typically see the greatest NOx benefit.

Scope 3: Production and Indirect Emissions

The production of HVO, encompassing feedstock collection, processing, refining, and transport to point of use, carries a materially lower carbon footprint than the equivalent upstream chain for fossil diesel. The use of waste feedstocks means there is no energy-intensive primary extraction phase, and the hydrotreatment process is increasingly powered by renewable energy at leading refineries.

For NGER reporters, Scope 3 emissions sit outside the direct reporting boundary but are increasingly relevant to corporate sustainability disclosures, supply chain emissions targets, and investor-facing climate reporting. Organisations committed to full value-chain decarbonisation will find HVO's upstream footprint significantly cleaner than fossil diesel's - contributing to the overall 90% lifecycle reduction figure.

Scope 1 vs Lifecycle - which figure should you use?

For NGER reporting, use the Scope 1 NGA factor - zero CO2 combustion emissions for HVO. For sustainability disclosures, net-zero strategy, or science-based targets, the full lifecycle figure (up to 90% reduction) provides the most complete picture of HVO's climate benefit. Both figures are legitimate; the right one depends on the reporting framework you are working within.

Summary: Changes When You Switch to HVO

Lifecycle (Well-to-Wheel)
↓ 90%

Total GHG reduction vs fossil diesel across the full fuel chain. [1]

Scope 1 CO2 (NGA 2025)
Zero

Biogenic carbon - not counted as a net atmospheric addition under the NGA. [1]

Particulate Matter
↓ 30-85%

Typical fleet reductions of 30-65%; up to 85% in controlled manufacturer testing. [2] [3]

Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)
↓ 7-30%

Varies by engine type and calibration. Greatest benefit in older non-aftertreatment engines. [2] [4]

Engine Changes Required
None

HVO is a direct drop-in replacement. No modifications, no blending limits, no disruption.

Carbon Offsets Required
None

Scope 1 CO2 is zero under the NGA - no offsets needed to eliminate direct combustion emissions.


Sources:

[1] Australian Government, DCCEEW. National Greenhouse Accounts (NGA) Factors 2025. Official emission factors for NGER reporting, including zero Scope 1 CO2 for renewable diesel (paraffinic diesel). Combined Scope 1 factor: 0.30 kg CO2-e/GJ (~0.012 kg CO2-e per litre). View PDF
[2] Action Sustainability / ISO20400.org. HVO Report: Alternative Fuel Assessment (March 2022). Reports NOx reductions of 19-30% and PM reductions of 65-85% compared to standard diesel. View PDF
[3] Cummins Inc. Generator Set Performance on HVO Fuel: QSK95 Test Report Summary. Engineering tests record 30-60% PM reduction vs ULSD #2 diesel. View report
[4] Karlsson et al. (2021). Applying the handprint approach to assess the air pollutant reduction potential of paraffinic renewable diesel fuel in the car fleet of the city of Helsinki. Journal of Cleaner Production. PM2.5 reductions of 49%, NOx local reduction potential of 7% for Euro 4-6 vehicle fleet. View study
[5] Bohl et al. (2018). Particulate number and NOx trade-off comparisons between HVO and mineral diesel in HD applications. Fuel, 215, 90-101. NOx reductions of up to 18% and PN reductions of 42-66% with injection optimisation. View study
[6] Hashimoto et al. (ACS Publications). Reductions in Particulate and NOx Emissions by Diesel Engine Parameter Adjustments with HVO Fuel. Environmental Science & Technology. PM and NOx both reducible by over 25% with engine parameter adjustments. View study

Disclaimer: This article is intended as a general information resource only. Lifecycle reduction figures and pollutant reduction percentages (NOx, PM) are drawn from the sources listed above and may vary depending on feedstock, production pathway, engine type, load conditions, and whether after treatment systems are fitted. This content does not constitute legal, regulatory, or technical advice. Organisations should verify applicable figures with their fuel supplier and relevant reporting authority.

Previous
Previous

Diesel just jumped over 50% in 10 trading days. Here’s what it means for Australian businesses.

Next
Next

Fossil Diesel, Biodiesel, HVO & SAF: What's the Difference?